City of Kingston

Planning Committee

Minutes

2025-02
-
Council Chamber
Members Present:
  • Councillor Cinanni; Chair
  • Councillor Chaves
  • Councillor Glenn
  • Councillor Oosterhof
  • Councillor Osanic
  • Councillor Stephen
Staff Present:
  • James Bar, Manager, Development Approvals
  • Ian Clendening, Senior Planner
  • Garret Hoegi, Manager of Development Engineering
  • Joel Konrad, Manager, Heritage Planning
  • Christine O'Connor, Committee Clerk
  • Tim Park, Director, Planning Services
  • Lindsay Reid, Senior Planner
  • Iain Sullivan, Committee Clerk
Others Present:
  • There were members of the public present.


Councillor Cinanni, Chair, explained the purpose of the meeting, read the rights and obligations afforded to the Committee members and members of the public during public and community meetings and reviewed the order of proceedings to clarify the speaking order for each public meeting.

The Chair called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.

  • Moved by:Councillor Glenn
    Seconded by:Councillor Oosterhof

    That the agenda be amended to include the addendum, and as amended, be approved. 

    Carried
  • Moved by:Councillor Chaves
    Seconded by:Councillor Osanic

    That the minutes of Planning Committee Meeting Number 01-2025, held Thursday, December 5, 2024, be approved. 

    Carried

There were none.

There were none.

Mr. Clendening conducted a PowerPoint presentation regarding the Zoning By-Law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision for 999 Purdy's Mill Road. A copy of this presentation is available upon request through the City Clerk's Department.

The Chair provided an opportunity for Committee members to ask questions.

Councillor Osanic inquired what direct communication had occurred with the Cataraqui Cemetery Board since the Public Meeting for this application in 2020. Mr. Clendening noted that there were 25 days of advanced notice given to the public for this meeting but added that he is unaware of any direct communication with the Cataraqui Cemetery Board on this file. Councillor Osanic stated that the public meeting in 2020 included many concerns brought forward by the Cataraqui Cemetery Board. Mr. Bar explained that a meeting onsite took place after the 2020 meeting with some representation from the Cataraqui Cemetery Board present. He added that direct stakeholder outreach was not conducted by staff.

Councillor Osanic inquired if a fence would be provided along the far western edge of the property. She further inquired if there were changes in the setback of the homes closest to the creek from the setbacks in the south built in phase one. Mr. Bar stated fencing would be examined through the site plan control application but noted that the security provided by a fence would have to be weighed against the potential loss of additional trees to construct the fence. Mr. Clendening confirmed that all residential lots are outside of the flood hazard zone with all building envelopes maintaining a 15-meter setback.

Councillor Osanic asked for confirmation that there would be a pathway and inquired if the pathway would be natural or paved. She further inquired if the backyards of the homes would be fenced so that encroachment into the creek system does not occur over time. Mr. Clendening stated that there would be a three-metre wide pathway flanking the rear lots lines of the subdivision. He noted that it is not the intention of the applicant to disturb the vegetation in the area. Mr. Bar stated that communication with the Cataraqui Conservation Authority is ongoing and staff have recommendations from the Environmental Impact Statement to consider during the final plan of subdivision. He added that these will be taken into account when considering a suitable edge condition for the lots.

Councillor Osanic asked for confirmation that 475 trees would be saved on the west end of the property. Mr. Clendening confirmed that this was correct.

Councillor Oosterhof inquired about the timelines for the development and whether the homes would be completed first. He asked if the single detached homes would be for purchase or rent and how large they would be. Mr. Bar explained that construction of the apartment buildings would likely begin first and the subdivision would be progressively built out. He added that the market would determine the size of the homes.

Councillor Chaves noted that a paved pathway may make the pathway more accessible for all residents of the area. He added that he foresees increased traffic on Purdy's Mill Road due to the congestion at nearby intersections. He inquired if the applicant would consider extending Old Mill Road to Arnold Street. Mr. Hoegi confirmed that the expectation is that there will be increased use of Purdy's Mill Road and that this will be taken into account in the study being completed as part of the Multi-Criteria Analysis study for the extension of Cataraqui Woods Drive. He added that staff are awaiting recommendations from the report regarding a re-classification of Old Mill Road and that the expectation for the expansion of Cataraqui Woods Drive is currently not to extend to Arnold Street.

Councillor Chaves inquired into features of the building that would be net-zero beyond the requirements of the Ontario Building Code. He further inquired if a community garden would be approved if requested by residents. Mr. Clendening noted that this information would be determined at the site plan control phase of the application.

Councillor Glenn inquired if any additional considerations had been given to heritage features of the apartment buildings to minimize the impact on the cemetery. She further inquired if any heritage conditions would apply to this development to ensure minimal impact. She urged the applicant to consider consulting with Heritage Staff. She added that housing with more than one or two bedrooms is needed and is more successful in reselling at this time.  Mr. Konrad noted that the Designation By-Law does not identify views as heritage attributes and added that no mitigation measures are required under the Ontario Heritage Act. He added that the orientation of the buildings has been altered to minimize impact but no other measures have been implemented to his knowledge.

The Chair provided an opportunity for members of the public to speak.

Robert MacInnes, 278 Sydenham Street, expressed concern regarding the construction of the homes in the floodplain and the ability for homeowners to secure insurance. He encouraged the developer to reconsider the number of homes near the stream and increase the density on the mid-rise buildings in case of flooding. He inquired if the developer would use mass-timber to construct the high-rise buildings and if the buildings would be heated and cooled with cold-air heat pumps.

Mark Misener, 201 Mill Pond Place, expressed concern for cut-through traffic in this area. He asked for the timeline of the development and expressed further concern for the construction access and inquired if alternate routes may be considered for access as opposed to Old Mill Road. 

Kerry Hill, expressed concern for the affordability of housing in Kingston. She noted the 700 housing units would result in the removal of hundreds of mature trees and the impact of the towers to the cemetery sightline. She expressed additional concern for the exclusion of community gardens in the proposal.

In response to public comments, Mr. Clendening stated that more details would come at a later phase regarding the building design and sustainability. He explained that a firm timeline of development could not be given at this time. He added that it is likely construction vehicles would use Old Mill Road. He noted that affordability is a concern and adding to the market will have a positive impact on the affordability of homes over time.

Mr. Hoegi added that construction access would be determined through the detailed design stages but noted that the expectation is that a second access to the subdivision will be built. He confirmed that a traffic calming study is required to be conducted.

Mr. Park noted that the Watson and Associates growth figures are based on 2021 Census numbers and added that the next federal census occurs in 2026. He stated that staff are still confident that the growth projection figures are representative.

Mr. Bar stated that the zoning being proposed reflects new environmental standards and pulls the development further from the cemetery than previously proposed and permitted.

Mark Touw, agent for the applicant, noted that the applicant did receive comments from the first public meeting and listed a number of changes made to the development in response to those comments. He stated that the closest point of the homes in the existing subdivision to the creek are about 24 metres to the creek. He explained that the minimum setback in the new subdivision would be 30 metres and that the applicant has identified room for community gardens. He added that the current plan is to build one- and two-bedroom units at around 1100-1200 square feet in size.

Councillor Osanic asked if the walkway path would be within the 30-metre ribbon of life and within the Environmental Protection Area (EPA). She reiterated the questions from the public regarding the towers being built in mass timber and if the buildings would be heated and cooled with cold air heat pumps. Mr. Clendening stated that there is significant space between the walkway and the watercourse. Mr. Bar noted that the developer does not construct with mass timber. Mr. Clendening added that the applicant has agreed to use cold air heat pumps for this development.

Councillor Osanic stated that there would be 475 trees remaining and encouraged irrigation for the survival of the remaining trees. She inquired whether the City could commit to holding a meeting with the Cataraqui Cemetery Board during the site plan approval stage of the development. She further inquired if the City could be held liable should there be flooding in the basement of the homes in this subdivision. Mr. Bar confirmed that the Cataraqui Cemetery Board would be included at the site plan approve stage and explained that the City cannot be held liable for good faith land use planning decisions.

Councillor Osanic inquired whether any of the parkland dedication would be EPA and whether the area is being classified as car-dependent. Mr. Clendening confirmed that the parkland area is outside of the EPA and added that staff are working with the applicant to make this subdivision transit-friendly for future transit opportunities. Mr. Park added that the extensions of Cataraqui Woods Drive and Purdy's Mill Road will allow transit to reconsider bus routes through the area.

  • Moved by:Councillor Chaves
    Seconded by:Councillor Osanic

    That the Planning Committee recommends to Council: 

    That the applications for zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision (File Number D35-002-2020) submitted by Homestead Land Holdings Limited, on behalf of Homestead Land Holdings Limited, for the property municipally known as 999 Purdy’s Mill Road, be approved; and 

    That Kingston Zoning By-Law Number 2022-62, as amended, be further amended, as per Exhibit A (Draft By-Law and Schedules A, B, and C to Amend Zoning By-Law Number 2022-62) to Report Number PC-25-005; and 

    That Kingston Zoning By-Law Number 76-26, as amended, be further amended, as per Exhibit B (Draft By-Law to Amend Zoning By-Law Number 76-26) to Report Number PC-25-005; and 

    That the draft plan of subdivision be subject to the conditions as per Exhibit C (Draft Plan of Subdivision Conditions) to Report Number PC-25-005; and 

    That Council determines that in accordance with Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is required prior to the passage of the by-laws; and 

    That the amending by-law be presented to Council for all three readings. 

    Carried

Ms. Didrikson conducted a PowerPoint presentation regarding the Zoning By-Law Amendment for 73 Sydenham Street. A copy of this presentation is available upon request through the City Clerk's Department.

The Chair provided an opportunity for Committee Members to ask questions.

Councillor Oosterhof asked what the capacity of the restaurant is and whether consideration had been given to parking. Ms. Didrikson stated that the existing seating capacity is 16 and that would continue to be the seating capacity. She added that non-residential uses do not require a minimal number of parking spaces so that was not a consideration for this application.

Martha Vosper expressed support for the application but noted some concerns for traffic and parking in the area, specifically on the corners of William Street and Sydenham Street and Earl Street and Sydenham Street. She added that businesses such as the Secret Garden add to the walkability of neighborhoods. She suggested that the courtyard parking could be identified as public parking for large events at the Spire to aid with parking issues in the area.

David Gordon, 67 Sydenham Street, expressed support for the application. He stated that the Secret Garden is a neighbourhood business that adds to the heritage district and to the city. He added that there is a parking garage one block away next to the hospital that always has space.

In response to public comments, Ms. Didrikson expressed confidence that the area can support the scope and scale of the application.

  • Moved by:Councillor Glenn
    Seconded by:Councillor Stephen

    That the Planning Committee recommends to Council: 

    That the application for a zoning by-law amendment (File Number D14-011-2024) submitted by Jason O’Brien and Fotenn Consultants, on behalf of Jason O’Brien, for the property municipally known as 73 Sydenham Street and 145 William Street, be approved; and 

    That Kingston Zoning By-Law Number 2022-62, as amended, be further amended, as per Exhibit A (Draft By-Law and Schedule A to Amend Zoning By-Law Number 2022-62) to Report Number PC-25-002; and 

    That Council determines that in accordance with Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is required prior to the passage of the by-law; and 

    That the amending by-law be presented to Council for all three readings. 

    Carried

Ms. Reid conducted a PowerPoint presentation regarding the Zoning By-Law Amendment for 234-242 University Avenue. A copy of this presentation is available upon request through the City Clerk's Department.

The Chair provided an opportunity for members of the Committee to ask questions.

Councillor Stephen inquired if the older additions would be removed and replaced by new additions. She further inquired how much thought had been given to bicycle security. Ms. Reid confirmed that the old additions would be removed and replaced. She added that there would an enclosure for bicycle storage.

Councillor Glenn inquired if there would be multiple ways for residents to enter and exit the back additions. She further inquired if there would be space for a delivery driver to pull into the carriageway without preventing residents from using the carriageway. Ms. Reid explained that there are multiple ways to enter the rear additions and noted that there is no space for a delivery vehicle to pull in.

Councillor Oosterhof inquired about Fire Department access to the additions and whether the exterior of the building would be in keeping with heritage considerations. Mr. Park stated that the re-design on the report has been done in consultation with the Fire Department. Ms. Reid added that there will be restoration to the exterior of the building.

Councillor Chaves inquired about the consideration of residents who currently park onsite. He asked for consideration of pollinator friendly shrubs for landscaping. Ms. Reid explained that this is an extensive project that will require the building to be vacant, therefore current residents will be vacated. Alex Adams, agent for the applicant, reiterated that the units will be vacated to allow the renovations to happen. New residents will be informed that there is no parking onsite.

The Chair asked when the building would be vacated and who resides in the building currently. Mr. Adams stated that he is unaware of the demographics of the current residents.

Bianca Mickelson, 242 University Avenue, inquired about the timeline for the project. She noted that many of the tenants currently living in the building are students.

In response to questions from the public, Mr. Adams stated that the timing of construction is currently unknown. He added that this project is likely to take a full year.

Councillor Glenn thanked the applicant for the work done to restore the buildings in this application.

  • Moved by:Councillor Chaves
    Seconded by:Councillor Glenn

    That the Planning Committee recommends to Council:

    That the application for a zoning by-law amendment (File Number D14-010-2024) submitted by The Boulevard Group, on behalf of 234-242 University Ave. ULC, for the property municipally known as 234-242 University Avenue, be approved; and

    That Kingston Zoning By-Law Number 2022-62, as amended, be further amended, as per Exhibit A (Draft By-Law and Schedules A, B and C to Amend Zoning By-Law Number 2022-62) to Report Number PC-25-007; and

    That Council determines that in accordance with Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is required prior to the passage of the by-law; and

    That the amending by-law be presented to Council for all three readings

    Carried

There were no motions.

There were no notices of motion.

There was no other business.

The next meeting of the Planning Committee is scheduled for Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 6:00 p.m.

  • Moved by:Councillor Chaves
    Seconded by:Councillor Stephen

    That the meeting of the Planning Committee be adjourned at 8:10 p.m.

    Carried